Methodology for determining coordinate points using automated software and aircraft
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54355/tbus/3.1.2023.0032Keywords:
Agisoft PhotoScan, surveying, automation, photogrammetry, geodesy, topographic mappingAbstract
Engineers are currently facing questions about the use of geographic information systems or software to implement projects in a short time. The problem with using geographic information systems in construction is the relevance of the available data. An example is open sources with satellite images. This problem appeared even before satellite-positioning systems emerged. In this connection, the purpose of this article is to find the deviation of source points when performing photogrammetry with marker detection in Agisoft PhotoScan software. This method of determining coordinates using a single point and its correlation on the ground is applicable in the case of rapid calculations, where the volumes of earth masses are large enough and do not require increased accuracy at the stage of approximate calculations. As a result of the comparison of traditional and automated methods of definition of coordinates on the ground has been found an essential distinction, both in total values and in time spent for the definition of points of coordinates. The considerable difference revealed by the results of the comparison of coordinates is presented in the table as a color gradation. The average deviation between known coordinates and coordinates obtained in Agisoft PhotoScan by axes was: X=0.87%, Y=0.45%, Z=0.12%.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Efficiency optimization and quality control of engineering geodesy processes in civil engineering / V. Berkhahn, F. Berner, H. Kutterer, V. Schwieger, J. Hirschner, I. Rehr, N. Rinke, J. Schweitzer // BAUINGENIEUR. — 2010. — Vol. 85. — P. 491–501.
UAS Point Cloud Accuracy Assessment Using Structure from Motion–Based Photogrammetry and PPK Georeferencing Technique for Building Surveying Applications / J.G. Martinez, G. Albeaino, M. Gheisari, W. Volkmann, L.F. Alarcón // Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. — 2021. — Vol. 35, No. 1. — P. 05020004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000936 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000936
Web-Based Architecture for Automating Quantity Surveying Construction Cost Calculation / J.H. Yousif, S. N. Abdul Majeed, F. J. I. Al Azzawi // Infrastructures. — 2020. — Vol. 5, No. 6. — P. 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures5060045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures5060045
Geometric accuracy investigations of terrestrial laser scanner systems in the laboratory and in the field / T.P. Kersten, M. Lindstaedt // Applied Geomatics. — 2022. — Vol. 14, No. 2. — P. 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-022-00442-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-022-00442-2
Assessing the Accuracy of High Resolution Digital Surface Models Computed by PhotoScan® and MicMac® in Sub-Optimal Survey Conditions / M. Jaud, S. Passot, R. Le Bivic, C. Delacourt, P. Grandjean, N. Le Dantec // Remote Sensing. — 2016. — Vol. 8, No. 6. — P. 465. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8060465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8060465
Structure from motion processing of analogue images captured by rollei metric camera, digitized with various scanning resolution / A. Dlesk, K. Vach, K. Pavelka // Acta Polytechnica. — 2020. — Vol. 60, No. 4. — P. 288–302. https://doi.org/10.14311/AP.2020.60.0288 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14311/AP.2020.60.0288
Assessing the performance of commercial Agisoft PhotoScan software to deliver reliable data for accurate3D modelling / A. Jebur, F. Abed, M. Mohammed // MATEC Web of Conferences. — 2018. — Vol. 162. — P. 03022. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816203022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816203022
Performance comparison analysis of 3D reconstruction modeling software in construction site visualization and mapping / A. Keyvanfar, A. Shafaghat, M.S. Rosley // International Journal of Architectural Computing. — 2022. — Vol. 20, No. 2. — P. 453–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/14780771211066876 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14780771211066876
A comparative study between photogrammetry and laser technology applied on model turbine blades / D. Nedelcu, G.R. Gillich, A. Gerocs, I. Padurean // Journal of Physics: Conference Series. — 2020. — Vol. 1426, No. 1. — P. 012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1426/1/012026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1426/1/012026
The analysis of the accuracy of spatial models using photogrammetric software: Agisoft Photoscan and Pix4D / A. Barbasiewicz, T. Widerski, K. Daliga // E3S Web of Conferences. — 2018. — Vol. 26. — P. 00012. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20182600012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20182600012
Assessing the performance of commercial Agisoft PhotoScan software to deliver reliable data for accurate3D modelling [Текст] / A. Jebur, F. Abed, M. Mohammed // MATEC Web of Conferences. — 2018. — Т. 162. — С. 03022. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816203022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816203022
Evaluation of Stereo Matching Algorithms and Dynamic Programming for 3D Triangulation / T.C. Huat, N.A. Manap // Advanced Computer and Communication Engineering Technology: Vol. 315: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. — Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. — P. 641–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07674-4_60 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07674-4_60
Construction and Accuracy Test of a 3D Model of Non-Metric Camera Images Using Agisoft PhotoScan / X. quan Li, Z. an Chen, L. ting Zhang, D. Jia // Procedia Environmental Sciences. — 2016. — Vol. 36. — P. 184–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.09.031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.09.031
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Zhassulan Kuzbakhov, Shyngys Zharassov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
