Flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams and prediction of failure stages
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54355/tbus/27897338.6.2.2026.0104Keywords:
reinforced concrete beams, flexural failure test, shear failure test, BP neural network, failure stageAbstract
Reinforced concrete (RC) beams are fundamental flexural members in engineering structures. The mechanisms of flexural failure and shear failure differ significantly and directly affect structural safety design. This study systematically investigates the mechanical responses of RC beams with two distinct reinforcement ratios under flexural failure and shear failure. A BP neural network model based on the Bayesian regularization algorithm is developed to predict the failure mode and load state of RC beams. Experimental results of flexural failure indicate that in RC beams, the tensile steel yields first (at a load of 60 kN, the steel strain reaches 1500 µε), followed by concrete crushing and the formation of a plastic hinge. The load‑deflection curve exhibits a pronounced yield flow stage (deflection jumps from 10.10 mm to 15.15 mm), demonstrating ductile failure with early warning characteristics. In contrast, shear failure tests show that under a short shear span ratio, the beam achieves a higher load‑carrying capacity (up to 140 kN, approximately 2.2 times that of the flexural beam) through an arch action. However, the failure is sudden and brittle: as the load increases from 120 kN to 140 kN, the deflection jumps by 4.75 mm, accompanied by a sharp increase in steel strain. Furthermore, the developed BP neural network model takes concrete strain as input and load as output. The regression values for training and testing are all close to 1 (0.994 and 0.996 for the flexural model; 0.999 and 0.998 for the shear model), with small mean square errors. The results demonstrate that the neural network model can predict the load and failure stage of RC beams with high accuracy, providing a reliable basis for engineering design against flexure and shear.
Downloads
Metrics
References
B. Bakleh, G. Wardeh, H. Hasan, A. Jahami, and A. Formisano, “A Physically Based 1D Finite Element Framework for Long-Term Flexural Response of Reinforced Concrete Beams,” CivilEng, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 15, 2026, doi: 10.3390/civileng7010015.
I. I. Luchko and V. F. Lazar, “Evaluation of Stresses in Reinforced-Concrete Beam Elements, Their Strength, and Crack Resistance,” Mater. Sci., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 136–150, 2002, doi: 10.1023/A:1020145420154.
Z. Nuguzhinov et al., “Stress Intensity Factor of Reinforced Concrete Beams in Bending,” Buildings, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 287, 2021, doi: 10.3390/buildings11070287.
P. L. Ng, J. Y. K. Lam, and A. K. H. Kwan, “Tension stiffening in concrete beams. Part 1: FE analysis,” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. - Struct. Build., vol. 163, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 2010, doi: 10.1680/stbu.2009.163.1.19.
L. C. Hoang and M. P. Nielsen, “Continuous reinforces concrete beams: stress and stiffness estimates in the serviceability limit state,” in BKM Serie R, Rapporter / Institut for Baerende Konstruktioner og Materialer, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet, Lyngby, Denmark: Danmarks Tekniske Universitet, 1996, p. 42.
L. Y. Zhou and L. Qiao, “Ultimate Load Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beam with Finite Element,” Adv. Mater. Res., vol. 243–249, pp. 1340–1345, 2011, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.243-249.1340.
A. R. T. Wayghan and V. Sadeghian, “A Shear Hinge Model for Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beams,” ACI Struct. J., vol. 118, no. 6, pp. 279–291, 2021, doi: 10.14359/51733001.
D. T. W. Looi, R. K. L. Su, and E. S. S. Lam, “A unified shear stress limit for reinforced concrete beam design,” HKIE Trans., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 223–234, 2015, doi: 10.1080/1023697X.2015.1102654.
M. V. G. Silveira and R. A. D. Souza, “Analysis and design of reinforced concrete deep beams using the stress fields method,” Acta Sci. Technol., vol. 39, no. 5, p. 587, 2017, doi: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v39i5.28409.
A. Jierula, X. Li, W. Wang, H. Niyazi, and S. Wang, “Experimental study on mechanical properties of polypropylene fiber foamed concrete after exposure to high temperatures,” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., vol. 24, p. e05966, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e05966.
A. Jierula, S. Ding, H. Liu, and B. Yang, “Damage Evolution in Different Reinforcement Configurations during Four-Point Bending: Acoustic Emission Analysis Using K-means Clustering,” J. Nondestruct. Eval., vol. 45, no. 1, p. 40, 2026, doi: 10.1007/s10921-026-01333-x.
A. Jierula, T.-M. Oh, S. Wang, J.-H. Lee, H. Kim, and J.-W. Lee, “Detection of damage locations and damage steps in pile foundations using acoustic emissions with deep learning technology,” Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 318–332, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11709-021-0715-y.
A. Jierula, S. Wang, T.-M. Oh, J.-W. Lee, and J. H. Lee, “Detection of source locations in RC columns using machine learning with acoustic emission data,” Eng. Struct., vol. 246, p. 112992, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112992.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abudusaimaiti Kali, Zihao Wang, Alipujiang Jierula

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Funding data
-
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Grant numbers (Grant No. 52368051). The abovementioned funding sources and support are gratefully acknowledged